Is PM / CM's visit at the combat site justified ?

Was there a need to visit the terror combat locations / areas which was recently attacked by the terrorists by our ministers ?

1. Cheif minister of Maharashtra
2. Sonia Gandhi
3. Manmohan Singh
4. R.R. Patil
5. Narendra Modi

These are some of the brave hearts who visited the combat location...for what to get them selves killed? or they were very sure that nothing will happen to them...is this something to think about?

Your soldiers and commandos are trying their best to combat the situations with the out-dated technology gadgets (as compared to the terrorists) , your news channels are spreading the news that RDX and other IEDs are found outside Taj / Trident hotel, was it a wise move by these leaders to visit these locations...

What were they trying to prove? they are as brave as their soldiers? (god-forbid) what if any one of the explosive goes off at the time of their visit? What if one of the terrorist fires these guys through the hotel window?

There were at least 3-4 terrorists escaped from various locations, and their whereabouts are yet to be determined...in this situation was the political visit really needed? cant they have a press meet at a secure location and pass their message to the people (if they want to take the political advantage of the situation)...

What were they thinking???? If anything happened to them wont that be "a feather in the cap" of the these terrorists? Or they were very sure that the terrorists will not shoot / attack at them???......

Unanswered Questions....

1. Why was morphine gas or tear gas not used in Nariman Bhavan (Chedda House) when they zeored on the location of the terrorist? (the question can be applied to Oberoi / Taj, but still the authorities can state that , its not used for the because there were lot of hostages in Hotel, but Nariman Bhavan there were only 5 hostages...)

2. How come the government allowed the live broadcast of the operations? (even if the terrorists are not watching the television live, they can have local support or some other means to communicate the people outside and get the updated information...)

3. Dont you think the media was partner with terrorist? (not in terms of the support, but in terms of execution, the whole idea of terrorist was to create terror and havoc in the society...dont you think the media has helped them in glorifying the terror events by saying two commandos were killed, ATS chief is killed etc., on the ongoing basis....havent the media helped the terrorist to acheive their goal?. Why did the government allow the boardcast at the first place? to make the terrorist motive a sucessful one?????)

4. What was the motive of the terrorist? Was it to create terror by killing people? If so they had ample chance to kill all the people who was staying the hotel, who were holed up in the ball room to save themselves? The actual action against terrorist started only after 17 hours of the seige...why havent they killed those many people who were unarmed and helpless??? Was killing people their only movtive? Was our government negotiating with the terrorists or their masters?

5. The way the encounter specialist and the ATS cheif shot was very dramatic and unbelievable , was it pre-meditated move by the terrorists?

6. Why our commandos are equipped with such low end gadgets, compared to terrorists...None of the commandos are carrying instruments like thermal heat sensors, night vision googles, communication gadgets etc., they were relying on the age-old walkie talkie models where the spectrum can be identified by the terrorist with simple equipments and monitor all the messages send / received by the commandos...

7. Why none of the operations look like a terrorist combat operation , instead it was looking like a team of red cross crops....trying to help the victims to reach hospitals....

8. 50 hours of continous combat...is it humany possible? or are we missing something , the estimated terrorists are much more than what we can think of...where by they are operating in shifts???

9. How come the constables standing infront of Taj / Oberoi was without bullet proof vest, are they sure that the terrorist were not going to use that exit?

These are some of them......many more to follow.....